India, as a sovereign nation, possesses the authority and autonomy to conduct its electoral processes independently, without undue influence or interference from external superpowers. Aravind Kejriwal's arrest led to the swift consolidation of opposition forces. Notably, Narendra Modi and Amit Shah refrained from intervening in the arrest, attributing it to the actions of the enforcement directorate. Media reports indicate a shift in narrative, with formerly fragmented opposition parties now appearing united. This contradicts earlier assertions by certain Lutyens media outlets, which claimed unanimous opposition against the perceived authoritarianism of the Narendra Modi government. It's evident that both past and present media narratives are shaped by their interests, particularly the I.N.D.I Alliance. Thus, what is disseminated through media channels constitutes a constructed narrative, serving as a tool for propaganda.In essence, this situation underscores the ongoing battle of competing narratives.
Germany has expressed its apprehension regarding the arrest of Aravind Kejriwal. What stake does Germany have in India's political landscape? Similarly. America has voiced its worry regarding arrest of Kejriwal. Why does America involve itself in Kejriwal's affairs, which are inherently domestic? Whether India decides to accept refugees or not, why is America interested when it doesn't have sovereignty over India's territory? The United Nations is closely monitoring these unfolding events. It's noteworthy to examine the narrative being constructed within India.
At the forefront of the weapon list is the concept of PROOF THEORY. Military authorities are rarely questioned about the necessity for proof. However, when the military sought evidence for the URI surgical strike, the Balakot attack followed, leading to direct questioning from India's own citizens. The concept of proof theory is wielded to challenge democracy and transparency within a nation. Following closely is the PIL (Public Interest Litigation) war, which unfolds within the country's courts. PILs are frequently initiated. hindering progress on various fronts. A notable example occurred in Dehradun, where a road expansion project at the border was halted by a PIL. The Prime Minister, in the presence of the Chief Justice, humorously remarked on a "Jolawala" who filed such a PIL. Subsequently. MV Ramana the Chief Justice of India addressed this PIL case the next day and lifted the stay. It's exasperating how a mere PIL can impede India's military endeavors.
Next in line is the media warfare, with the active participation of prominent figures like Barkha Dutt, Srinivasan Jain, Sagarika Ghosh, Rajdeep Sardesai, Ravish Kumar, Nidhi Razdan and few others. Following this is the unsettling trend of communal clashes. What began as the Delhi CAA movement spiraled into a riot. There were sinister intentions to incite communal discord, evidenced by the thwarted plan of Hathras. Fortunately, Siddique Kappan's arrest preempted his entry into Uttar Pradesh. Siddique Kappan, who leads a media conglomerate, exerts influence over news editors who may unwittingly align with his agenda. Despite professing journalistic freedom, these editors are unwittingly swayed by Siddique Kappan's influence. These so-called joumalists serve as conduits for Siddique Kappan's narrative, portraying them as mere pawns in a larger geopolitical chess game. The dynamics of this chessboard warrant closer examination.
Following closely is the issue of stagnation, where progress is deliberately hindered by stalling processes. Whenever a new scheme is proposed, detractors often label it as unconstitutional or fascist, effectively halting the advancement of India as a country. This pattem of obstructionism is not a recent development but has persisted over time.
When India gained independence, the rulers anticipated internal strife leading to its demise. Britain and other colonial powers calculated that the diverse linguistic, cultural, class, creed, and religious differences within the newly independent nation would result in conflict. With a total of 530 provinces, including Pakistan, it was speculated that these entities would splinter into separate nations within a decade. This notion, akin to the concept of a thousand cuts, was expected to weaken India. However, contrary to expectations, India's unity and progress defied these predictions. Instead of fragmentation, India has steadily grown in strength, positioning itself to become one of the leading nations globally. This trajectory of I development poses a significant challenge to the aspirations of superpowers, unsettling their dominance on the global stage.
In 1973, Gene Sharp authored a book titled "The Politics of Nonviolent Action: 198 Methods." Essentially, it encapsulated Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi's principles of civil disobedience in written form. This seminal work later evolved into an institution, the Albert Einstein Institution for Regime Change in East Boston, United States, established in 1983. Interestingly, the choice of Albert Einstein's name for the institute aimed to imbue its findings with a semblance of scientific credibility, enhancing its public reception. Einstein's own perspectives on passive resistance and nonviolent action were contentious during his lifetime and remain topics of scholarly discourse. Despite some misinterpretations of his political stance, it's crucial to recognize that Einstein's writings on nonviolent resistance primarily focused on its practical implications for societal advancement rather than delving deeply into the philosophical nuances of passive resistance.
It is claimed that the Albert Einstein Institution for Regime Change was implicated in three significant uprisings in Venezuela. These allegations were voiced by Hugo Chavez Venezuela's former president. Additionally, the Venezuelan government presented evidence to the public to support the notion of the institution's involvement. Similarly, the analysis into Aravind Kejriwal also points towards the Albert Einstein Institution for Regime Change's involvement in India.
Until recently, Rahul Gandhi dominated the news headlines. However, in the past eight months, there has been a noticeable shift, with Aravind Kejriwal taking Rahul Gandhi's place. Rahul Gandhi commenced with a nationwide Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra campaign, which culminated in a significant misstep and controversy regarding ethnic elimination. This misstep eroded confidence In Rahul Gandhi among major players, prompting them to redirect their focus towards Aravind Kejriwal. The transition from Rahul Gandhi to Aravind Kejriwal was not coincidental; rather, it was a strategic response to the loss of confidence in Rahul Gandhi. Major players observed Rahul Gandhi's shortcomings and began investing in Aravind Kejriwal. Initially, this Investment was evident through accolades such as The Ramon Magsaysay Award bestowed upon Aravind Kejriwal. Ramon Magsaysay award is known as Asia's leading award and supreme recognition, that celebrates the immense spirit demonstrated in altruistic service to Asia's populace. Subsequently, Aravind Kejriwal was gradually drawn into the anti-corruption movement alongside Anna Hazare. However, Anna Hazare's presence in the movement was gradually diminished, and other team members were sidelined, while Aravind Kejriwal emerged as the central figure, portrayed as the hero of the anti-corruption crusade.
There reached a point where every statement made by Aravind Kejriwal was featured prominently in international media outlets like BBC and Al Jazeera, overshadowing the voices of national leaders. Despite Delhi lacking statehood, Aravind Kejriwal's voice became synonymous with the nation's voice, despite his role as a leader representing just 4 crore people. This unprecedented international Importance accorded to Aravind Kejriwal raises questions about the underlying reasons behind it. It appears that certain agendas championed by Aravind Kejriwal align with the interests of specific institutions within the country. Consequently, suspicions arose regarding Aravind Kejriwal's involvement in orchestrating a coup d'état. With this scenario unfolding, the intelligence agencies and other forces intervened, leading to Aravind Kejriwal's arrest.
The tactics employed by these institutions are delineated in Gene Sharp's book. I'll provide a list of the main heads and briefly outline a few to prevent the essay from becoming too lengthy.
THE METHODS OF NONVIOLENT PROTEST AND PERSUASION
From Gene Sharp, The Methods of Nonviolent Action, Boston 1973
FORMAL STATEMENTS
1. Public speeches
2. Letters of opposition or support
3. Declarations by organizations and institutions
4. Signed public declarations
5. Declarations of indictment and intention
6. Group or mass petitions
COMMUNICATIONS WITH A WIDER AUDIENCE
7. Slogans, caricatures, and symbols
8. Banners, posters, and displayed communications
9. Leaflets, pamphlets, and books
10. Newspapers and journals
11. Records, radio, and television
12. Skywriting and earth writing
GROUP REPRESENTATIONS
13. Deputations
14. Mock awards
15. Group lobbying
16. Picketing
17. Mock elections
SYMBOLIC PUBLIC ACTS
18. Displays of flags and symbolic colors
19. Wearing of symbols
20. Prayer and worship
21. Delivering symbolic objects
22. Protest disrobing's
23. Destruction of own property
24. Symbolic lights
25. Displays of portraits
26. Paint as protest
27. New signs and names
28. Symbolic sounds
29. Symbolic reclamations
30. Rude gestures
PRESSURES ON INDIVIDUALS
31. "Haunting" officials
32. Taunting officials
33. Fraternization
34. Vigils
DRAMA AND MUSIC
35. Humourous skits and pranks
36. Performances of plays and music
37. Singing
PROCESSIONS
38. Marches
39. Parades
40. Religious processions
41. Pilgrimages
42. Motorcades
HONOURING THE DEAD
43. Political mourning
44. Mock funerals
45. Demonstrative funerals
46. Homage at burial places
PUBLIC ASSEMBLIES
47. Assemblies of protest or support
48. Protest meetings
49. Camouflaged meetings of protest
50. Teach-ins
WITHDRAWAL AND RENUNCIATION
51. Walk-outs
52. Silence
53. Renouncing honors
54. Turning one's back
THE METHODS OF SOCIAL NONCOOPERATION
OSTRACISM OF PERSONS
55. Social boycott
56. Selective social boycott
57. Lysistratic non-action
58. Excommunication
59. Interdict
NON-COOPERATION WITH SOCIAL EVENTS, CUSTOMS, AND INSTITUTIONS
60. Suspension of social and sports activities
61. Boycott of social affairs
62. Student strike
63. Social disobedience
64. Withdrawal from social institutions
WITHDRAWAL FROM THE SOCIAL SYSTEM
65. Stay-at-home
66. Total personal noncooperation 67. "Flight" of workers
68. Sanctuary
69. Collective disappearance
70. Protest emigration (*hijrat)
THE METHODS OF ECONOMIC NONCOOPERATION: ECONOMIC BOYCOTTS
ACTION BY CONSUMERS
71. Consumers' boycott
72. Non-consumption of boycotted goods
73. Policy of austerity
74. Rent withholding 75. Refusal to rent
76. National consumers' boycott
77. International consumers' boycott
ACTION BY WORKERS AND PRODUCERS
78 Workers' boycott
79 Producers boycott
ACTION BY MIDDLEMEN
80. Suppliers' and handlers' boycott
ACTION BY OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
81. Traders' boycott
82. Refusal to let or sell property
83. Lockout
84. Refusal of industrial assistance
85. Merchants' "general strike"
ACTION BY HOLDERS OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES
86. Withdrawal of bank deposits
87. Refusal to pay fees, dues, and assessments
88. Refusal to pay debts or interest
89. Severance of funds and credit 90. Revenue refusal
91. Refusal of a government's money
ACTION BY GOVERNMENTS
92. Domestic embargo
93. Blacklisting of traders 94, International sellers" embargo
95. International buyers embargo
96. International trade embargo
THE METHODS OF ECONOMIC NONCOOPERATION: THE STRIKE
SYMBOLIC STRIKES
97. Protest strike
98. Quickie walkout (lightning strike)
AGRICULTURAL STRIKES
99. Peasant strike.
100. 100. Farm workers' strike
STRIKES BY SPECIAL GROUPS
101. Refusal of impressed labour
102. Prisoners strike
103. Craft strike
104. Professional strike
ORDINARY INDUSTRIAL STRIKES
106. Industry strike
107 Sympathy strike
RESTRICTED STRIKES
109. Bumper strike
110. Slowdown strike
111. Working-to-rule strike
113 Strike by resignation
114. Limited strike Selective strike
116. Generalised strike
117. General strike
COMBINATION OF STRIKES AND ECONOMIC CLOSURES
118. Hartal
119. Economic shutdown
THE METHODS OF POLITICAL NONCOOPERATION
REJECTION OF AUTHORITY
120. Withholding or withdrawal of allegiance
121. Refusal of public support
122. Literature and speeches advocating resistance
CITIZENS NONCOOPERATION WITH GOVERNMENT
123. Boycott of legislative bodies
124. Boycott of elections
125. Boycott of government employment and positions
126. Boycott of government departments, agencies, and other bodies
128. Boycott of government-supported institutions
129. Refusal of assistance to enforcement agents
130. Removal of own signs and placemarks
CITIZENS ALTERNATIVES TO OBEDIENCE
133. Reluctant and slow compliance
134. Non-obedience in absence of direct supervision
135. Popular non-obedience
136. Disguised disobedience
137. Refusal of an assemblage or meeting to disperse
138. Sit-down
139. Noncooperation with conscription and deportation
140. Hiding, escape, and false identities
141. Civil disobedience of "illegitimate" laws
ACTION BY GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL
142 Selective refusal of assistance by government aides
143. Blocking of lines of command and information
144. Stalling and obstruction
145. General administrative non cooperation
147. Deliberate inefficiency and selective noncooperation by enforcement agents
148. Mutiny
DOMESTIC GOVERNMENTAL ACTION
149. Quasi-legal evasions and delays
150. Noncooperation by constituent governmental units
INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENTAL ACTION
151. Changes in diplomatic and other representation
152. Delay and cancellation of diplomatic events
153. Withholding of diplomatic recognition
154. Severance of diplomatic relations
155. Withdrawal from international organisations
156. Refusal of membership in international bodies
157. Expulsion from international organisations
THE METHODS OF NONVIOLENT INTERVENTION
PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION
158. Self-exposure to the elements
159. The Fast :-
160. Reverse trial
161. Nonviolent harassment
PHYSICAL INTERVENTION
162 Sit-in
163. Stand-in
164. Ride-in
165. Wade-in
166. Mill-in
167. Pray-in
168. Nonviolent raids
169. Nonviolent air raids
170 Nonviolent invasion
171. Nonviolent interjection
172. Nonviolent obstruction
173. Nonviolent occupation
SOCIAL INTERVENTION
174. Establishing new social patterns
175. Overloading of facilities
176. Stall-in
177. Speak-in
178. Guerrilla theatre
179. Alternative social institutions
180. Alternative communication system
ECONOMIC INTERVENTION
182. Stay-in strike
183. Nonviolent land seizure
184. Defiance of blockades
185. Politically motivated counterfeiting
186. Preclusive purchasing
187. Seizure of assets
188. Dumping
189. Selective patronage
190. Alternative markets
191. Alternative transportation systems
192. Alternative economic institutions
POLITICAL INTERVENTION
194. Disclosing identities of secret agents
195. Seeking imprisonment
196. Civil disobedience of "neutral" laws
197. Work-on without collaboration
198. Dual sovereignty and parallel government
The anti-national elements would employ every method from the list of 198 tactics to destabilize the country. While it's unfeasible to detail all 198 methods outlined in the book, I'll outline a few that have been extensively employed by anti-national elements in India over the past decade.
Public speeches serve as a prominent method. If one closely analyses speeches from eminent leaders in Southern regions of India, particularly Kerala, Karnataka, Tamilnadu, they predominantly focus on sowing division within the country. The underlying agenda behind many of these speeches has been to foster discord and fragmentation, with a particular emphasis on the South being targeted for division. The CUTTING SOUTH agenda.
The second method involves declarations made by organizations and institutions. Take, for instance, the declarations issued by certain emerging institutes, as well as indices like the poverty index or the happiness index. These statistics, originating from relatively obscure institutes in Hungary, Canada, Australia, and similar places, are often wielded by India's media to discredit and destabilize the nation. For example, amidst America's withdrawal from Afghanistan, it left behind a significant number of tanks, seemingly to exert pressure on Pakistan. During recent elections in Pakistan, reports surfaced of military forces encroaching upon polling booths and casting votes. While the United States downplayed these incidents as minor irregularities, it concurrently voiced concerns regarding India's electoral bonds, farmer protests, and the state of democracy. This narrative echoes among certain journalists In the country, who often echo American sentiments. Notably, there's a conspicuous absence of programs centered on patriotism across mainstream channels. Apart from live broadcasts of Republic Day and Independence Day celebrations, patriotic programming is largely absent.
The third method encompasses mass-signed public declarations and group petitions, which are disseminated through various mediums such as songs, cartoons, caricatures, newspapers, print, and social media. Notable examples include petitions related to OROP, anti-CAA, and UCC, among others.
As for the fourth method, it involves group lobbying efforts. This may entail the presence of a group of physically imposing individuals with long beards and shaven mustaches entering news media establishments to engage in polite discussions with the owners. These Individuals offer advice to the establishment owners regarding their preferences, and if their advice is not heeded, consequences may follow. Additionally, another tactic employed is color symbolism, often manifesting as Dark-white color fights. The recent incident in Kerala Involving remarks on color by Sathyabhama is alarming. She stated, "The performer of Mohiniyattam should embody 'mohini (enchantment). He has the complexion of a crow. This dance form necessitates a posture with legs wide apart."
Another method is protest emigration, also known as hijrat, which involves using emigration as an activist tactic when political change seems unattainable within a jurisdiction. It's intriguing how the Albert Einstein Institute in East Boston references an Arabic word mentioned in the 'Quran'!
Of particular interest is the 99th method, peasant strike, or farmers' protest. India experienced a 13-month-long farmers' protest, where tractors, typically considered nonviolent, unfortunately resulted in the loss of one life. Questions arise regarding the funding of these protests, with Aravind Kejriwal purportedly providing support. Interestingly. when the Red Fort was captured during the protest, Aravind Kejriwal remained silent. Subsequently, Aravind Kejriwal emerged victorious in Punjab's assembly elections. In the recent farmers' protest, India prevented farmers from crossing the border, tuming it into a demonstration of strength between Canada and India. India explicitly stated that OCI and passport privileges would be revoked to quell the protest. The 100th method, farm workers' strike, remains unseen thus far. Soon to be expected!
Next is the boycott of legislative bodies, a tactic witnessed during the passing of over 60 bills in parliament. Opposition members often boycott discussions, resulting in bills being passed without proper debate. Among the Gene Sharp's 198 tactics, one of the most conceming is judicial non-cooperation. While it's prudent not to delve deeply into this topic. there have been instances of peculiar rulings and judiciary interference. Method 149 involves quasi-legal evasion and delays, where government units may subtly defy laws or court decisions they disagree with, In Aravind Kejriwal's case, he ignored nine summonses sent to him. Method 150 is non-cooperation by constituent government units, exemplified by states sending petitions against the President of India, particularly observed in the South of India. Both states Kerala and Tamilnadu has approached India's Apex Court on similar Issues. Establishing new social patterns, such as advocating for LGBTQ rights, aims to disrupt traditional family structures.
The current leader spearheading regime change narrative is Aravind Kejriwal. India took decisive action by arresting Aravind Kejriwal during an interim break, averting what could have potentially been a severe uprising in the nation. The primary objective of regime change narrative was to thwart elections at any cost, with the next likely move being an attempt to coerce India into declaring a state of emergency, thus consolidating power and potentially becoming one of the world's largest autocracies. Following such a scenario, a natural backlash from the people against the establishment would ensue. Revolutionary tactics utilizing new technologies would likely be employed for regime change. While the general populace may rest, the National Security Advisor and other high-ranking officials within the government will remain vigilant for the next three months until the elections conclude. Interestingly, the arrests of prominent figures such as Chidambaram, A Raja, K Kanimozhi, J Jayalalitha, Lalu Prasad Yadav, and Hemant Soren were met with minimal international reaction or commentary. However, the arrest of Aravind Kejriwal has yet to elicit responses from countries like Germany, America, and others, indicating Aravind Kejriwal's pivotal role in this narrative.
Consider the Egyptian Jasmine Revolution as a poignant example. This revolution, characterised by a series of protests and political unrest, unfolded in Egypt in 2011. Initially sparked by a group of demonstrators calling for the release of political prisoners and an end to corruption, the movement swiftly gained momentum. Millions of Egyptians joined the protests, filling the streets with demands for governmental change. The revolution persisted for 18 days, culminating in the resignation of President Hosni Mubarak and the establishment of a new government. Method 151, dual sovereignty and parallel government. was what happened in Egypt in reality. The same reflects in the movement of the organized "cutting South" agenda in India is evolving. All this narrative that has persisted since 1973.
The saga surrounding Aravind Kejriwal commenced in 2012, marked by a peculiar twist where the anti-corruption wave failed to align with Aravind Kejriwal and instead became associated with India. The so-called Hindutva ideology has proliferated across every corner of the nation, permeating various segments of society. This unexpected turn disrupted the narrative, leading to a three-year struggle to find a means to undermine India. Aravind Kejriwal's influence diminished, relegated to a minor role. Despite repeated attempts, each effort faltered, allowing India to reaffirm its resilience. India had to vigorously counter every narrative aimed against the nation's interests.
The entire narrative unfolds according to a meticulously crafted plan outlined in a Gene Sharp's book, adhering strictly to its directives. Ultimately, the goal is to establish dual sovereignty, a concept that can be implemented using Gandhian principles. Notably, Bijoy Lall Chaterjee's book "Gandhi, Champion of the Proletariat explores Gandhi's potential to subvert India. Former AICC president from Kerala, Sir C. Shankaran Nair, delves into this concept further in his book "Gandhi and Anarchy." Nair warns that Gandhi's embrace of anarchy within the nonviolent movement could have lead to the country's ruin.
Propaganda and narratives orchestrated by figures like George Soros, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation, and the Clinton Foundation aim to inflict a thousand cuts upon the nation, with the ultimate goal of obstructing coming 2024 elections. A dedicated team works tirelessly around the clock toward this objective. It's crucial to exercise patience and discemment in evaluating the decisions made by Indian government amidst these complex circumstances.
In essence, just as Gandhi symbolizes the attainment of national freedom through nonviolence, his principles can also be manipulated to dismantle and undermine the very nation he helped liberate. Similarly, Albert Einstein, known for his contributions to the development of the atom bomb, lends his name to an institute dedicated to regime change in developing countries under the guise of nonviolence, driven by an agenda-driven narrative. Both Gandhi and Einstein's narratives are weaponized to dismantle nations through a facade of nonviolence. The initial arrest of Aravind Kejriwal holds deeper implications than commonly perceived.
Article by
Vimal M
Younginker
Mumbai, Maharashtra