BRI Leaves Nations in Debt Amid Xi’s Ambitions

Communist China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has left numerous countries grappling with debt, environmental damage, and strategic exploitation.

The Narrative World    30-Sep-2024   
Total Views |
Representative Image
 
Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), launched in 2013, was marketed as a transformative global project aimed at building infrastructure and fostering economic cooperation.
 
However, behind the grand promises of prosperity and development lies a murkier reality.
 
The BRI has increasingly become a tool for Chinese dominance, trapping countries in debt, ignoring environmental and social concerns, and pushing Communist China’s strategic interests at the cost of others.
 
BRI, despite its promises of prosperity, has left many countries reeling from financial burdens.
 
Nations like Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and Djibouti have found themselves struggling under the weight of massive loans they can barely service, much less repay.
 
In Sri Lanka, for instance, China’s financing of the Hambantota port turned into a nightmare, forcing the country to hand over the strategic port to Beijing on a 99-year lease after defaulting on its loan.
 
The situation in Pakistan is no better, where Chinese-backed infrastructure projects have led to massive budget deficits, triggering fears of a potential economic collapse.
 
Even Indonesia’s $5.5 billion high-speed rail project, part of the BRI, has faced repeated bailouts, with projections indicating it may take four decades to break even.
 
This phenomenon, often referred to as “debt-trap diplomacy,” illustrates how China’s financial dominance over these nations allows Beijing to exert influence over their strategic assets.
 
Representative Image
 
Rather than fostering sustainable development, Xi’s vision has increasingly tied vulnerable nations into exploitative financial agreements, allowing China to assert control over key infrastructure projects, including ports, highways, and energy grids.
 
Corruption and opacity plague the BRI, with Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and local officials benefiting from kickbacks, while recipient countries suffer the consequences.
 
In many cases, Chinese contractors have overcharged, and projects have proceeded without proper feasibility studies or environmental safeguards.
 
In Ecuador, a poorly planned hydroelectric dam funded by BRI loans not only displaced millions but also caused significant environmental damage, leading to outcry from local communities.
 
BRI’s disregard for human rights and local laws has exacerbated problems, with labour violations and social displacements becoming the norm.
 
Moreover, the initiative’s focus on extracting resources for China’s benefit has led to severe biodiversity loss, especially in Africa and Latin America, where mining and deforestation driven by BRI projects have ravaged ecosystems.
 
Beyond its financial and environmental tolls, the BRI is fundamentally a geopolitical tool, crafted to expand China’s influence globally.
 
Xi Jinping’s plan has not only helped China access critical resources in Africa, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia, but it has also established strategic footholds in key regions.
 
China’s port-building spree under the BRI is as much about resupplying Chinese military vessels as it is about promoting trade.
 
This geopolitical ambition has led to growing concerns that the BRI is not a development project, but a means for China to reshape the global order in its favour.
 
Representative Image
 
Through the BRI, Beijing has expanded its presence in regions that were traditionally under Western influence, creating dependencies that extend far beyond financial aid.
 
Many experts now argue that BRI is less about mutual cooperation and more about exporting Chinese state capitalism and reinforcing Xi’s long-term vision for global dominance.
 
As the BRI enters its second decade, the cracks in its glossy exterior are showing.
 
For countries considering partnerships with China, the experiences of Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Ecuador, and others serve as cautionary tales.
 
Xi Jinping’s initiative may have been marketed as a win-win solution for developing countries, but in reality, it has left many with crippling debt, damaged environments, and a growing dependence on Beijing.
 
The Belt and Road Initiative may be Xi Jinping’s flagship foreign policy, but for the nations caught in its web, it is proving to be a dangerous and costly venture.
 
As more countries wake up to the realities of China’s debt-trap diplomacy, the world must reassess its engagement with a rising superpower intent on shaping global systems to serve its own strategic interests.
 
Article by
Shomen Chandra
Sub Editor, The Narrative